Haruka Kaji vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Madelief Hageman shows a slight edge in winning second serve points, achieving 38.79% compared to Haruka Kaji’s 37.56%. Could this small advantage make a difference in the match?
• Return Game Stats: Haruka Kaji has been stronger in returning second serves, with a win rate of 52.56% against opponents, compared to Hageman's 49.84%. For first serve returns, Hageman edges out with 37.14% against Kaji's 36.20%. This could suggest a tighter match owing to their respective strengths in returns.
• Performance Under Pressure: Hageman has saved 47.64% of breakpoints, whereas Kaji has saved 43.75%. Hageman may have the upper hand in high-pressure situations.
• Overall Match Performance: In the past year, Kaji holds a slightly better win rate of 52.94% (W/L 36/32) compared to Hageman’s 51.61% (W/L 32/30).
• Best Surface Performance: Hageman excels on clay with a career win rate of 52%, while Kaji performs best on indoor hard courts with the same win rate. Could surface type play a critical role in the outcome?
• Player Level and Quality of Opponents: Kaji competes more frequently in higher-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF > $10K) with a 55.56% win rate compared to Hageman’s 47.83% in smaller events. Hageman's opponents have had an average higher rank, possibly indicating exposure to tougher competition.
• Deciding Set Performance: When matches extend to a final set, Kaji has been more successful, winning 50% of deciding sets in the last year, while Hageman only secures 35% of these tense situations.
• Break Point Conversion: Both players are near equal in breakpoint conversion, with Hageman at 42.62% and Kaji at 42.19%, suggesting they are evenly matched in creating and capitalizing on opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Madelief Hageman and Haruka Kaji presents a closely contested battle based on recent statistics.

Hageman shows a slight advantage in saving breakpoints and managing pressure situations, which could serve as an edge during crucial points.

However, Kaji's better performance in second serve returns and her success in deciding sets highlight her resilience when matches get tight.

Overall, Kaji's experience in higher-tier tournaments and her success rate in critical match-building stages suggest she might have a slight edge in securing the win.

Based on the available data, Haruka Kaji is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.